<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FrostCloud.com | Elements of Wisdom | Self Improvement | Personal Enlightenment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frostcloud.com/elements/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements</link>
	<description>Elements of Wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relish the challenge. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/relish-the-challenge/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=94#comment-41</guid>
		<description>THE SIMPLEST KNOWLEDGE IS THE KEY FOR THE WHOLE KNOWLEDGE OF THE REALITY   
We, common men, philosophers and scientists, are really prepared to achieve the true knowledge of the reality? The division between philosophy and science denotes human knowledge deficiency, why of this division? There is also a separation between different physical sciences, there is separation between different theories, and here we have to pose the same question of why such a separation.
Should the response to this separation be achieved in advance or should we wait for it when scientific progress will be given some day in the future, which is not really guaranteed? In my convictions the first one must be met in advance, i.e. first of all we must know the answer in order to achieve the total knowledge of the reality and we should not expect the response at the end.

The fundamental question we must pose and answer is: WHAT IS THE SELF?; the response is within our reach; so why do we not accomplish it even if it is simply about ourselves? What is what prevents us from seeing ourselves in our true self? Socrates in ancient Greece had already referred to that when said &quot;Noscete ipsum&quot; as the primary knowledge, and I dare to indicate that all knowledge is absolutely concerned to the self; there is nothing outside, everything is within the self and if not would not be possible to have certain knowledge of whichever order. 

The intelligence of every researched thing is not in it; we should understand the mirage; the intelligence of everything is in oneself.  Then we all have a primary task to be met; nobody should expect the response in others. True science is in ourselves, which is in the discovery of the self in each one of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE SIMPLEST KNOWLEDGE IS THE KEY FOR THE WHOLE KNOWLEDGE OF THE REALITY<br />
We, common men, philosophers and scientists, are really prepared to achieve the true knowledge of the reality? The division between philosophy and science denotes human knowledge deficiency, why of this division? There is also a separation between different physical sciences, there is separation between different theories, and here we have to pose the same question of why such a separation.<br />
Should the response to this separation be achieved in advance or should we wait for it when scientific progress will be given some day in the future, which is not really guaranteed? In my convictions the first one must be met in advance, i.e. first of all we must know the answer in order to achieve the total knowledge of the reality and we should not expect the response at the end.</p>
<p>The fundamental question we must pose and answer is: WHAT IS THE SELF?; the response is within our reach; so why do we not accomplish it even if it is simply about ourselves? What is what prevents us from seeing ourselves in our true self? Socrates in ancient Greece had already referred to that when said &#8220;Noscete ipsum&#8221; as the primary knowledge, and I dare to indicate that all knowledge is absolutely concerned to the self; there is nothing outside, everything is within the self and if not would not be possible to have certain knowledge of whichever order. </p>
<p>The intelligence of every researched thing is not in it; we should understand the mirage; the intelligence of everything is in oneself.  Then we all have a primary task to be met; nobody should expect the response in others. True science is in ourselves, which is in the discovery of the self in each one of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relish the challenge. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/relish-the-challenge/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=94#comment-40</guid>
		<description>SOMETHING AMAZINGLY REVEALS THE CONCEPT OF &quot;MATTER&quot; 
I want to express here a series of intuitions aroused by my interest in the so-called &quot;quantum physics&quot; which, surely unconsciously might be revolutionizing the concept of science.
That’s amazing for science itself.  “Matter” formerly made objective will be clearly revealed as the same Being and its creative nuclear structure. The being of the things is in us as creators and of them perceivers. Materialism, according to Wikipedia &quot;is a philosophical current which aims to solve the cardinal or fundamental problem of philosophy about the relation between thinking and being, as opposed to idealism, between spirit and nature, postulating that matter is primary and consciousness and thinking are as its results...&quot;  But let’s realize how concepts are inverted here and how the concept of &quot;matter&quot; is leading to the same point because it considered just as primary, is erroneously made objective and not subjective in our very being as the true universal, origin of consciousness and thoughts.

OBJECTIFICATION OF MATTER AS RESORT&#039;S APPROACH TO SCIENCE.
Science is primarily descriptive and as such can only be objective. The &quot;matter&quot; core of everything is in the same Being and its own consciousness. A way of materializing it (i.e. to see it an objective way) is considering it as a magnetic core with two concentration and diffusion forces. The nature of such forces or energy is not something objective because we can only guess through what moves or transforms; we see the effect and not the cause. Our will is power and we cannot see the difference between the two (will and energy) but making them subjective and objective in this order. Only in this way we can resolve the duality of the concept of energy. I don&#039;t know if this is clear for scientists busy on this issue or if instead, the mental nature of reality is even ignored and considered falsely as physical or in a purely objective sense. Nothing, absolutely nothing escapes some concept or idea; we need to deepen on this in our interior to convince us. It is the same Being the subject of movement; we see it as on the outside as if it were something that we, ourselves, are not. The link between our personal and impersonal Being manifested in the plurality of beings and things is a mystery that can only be revealed from the inside each of us.

THE NATURE OF THE MOBILE AND CHANGEABLE
What is finally what moves and changes, i.e. what is subject to the two nuclear forces of the Being (&quot;matter&quot;)? If I affirm that it is the same Being or matter I’ll be correct. We as a collective Being are making objective this active &quot;matter&quot;. All things that we call physical are not but the collective objectification of ideas. Nothing, absolutely nothing escapes to some concept; we need to deepen our interior on this to convince us. It is the same as being subject of movement; we see it outside as if it were something that we, ourselves, are not. The link between our personal being and impersonal being manifested in the plurality of beings and things is a mystery that can only be revealed from the inside of each of us. If this is so, scientific methodology would have a profound revolution, the &quot;physical&quot; call it &quot;laboratory&quot; experimentation will have no more priority. Real scientific experimentation will have field only from the inside of each of us and the socialization of science could only be done via intellect by discoverers of universal facts in which the Being plays the central role.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOMETHING AMAZINGLY REVEALS THE CONCEPT OF &#8220;MATTER&#8221;<br />
I want to express here a series of intuitions aroused by my interest in the so-called &#8220;quantum physics&#8221; which, surely unconsciously might be revolutionizing the concept of science.<br />
That’s amazing for science itself.  “Matter” formerly made objective will be clearly revealed as the same Being and its creative nuclear structure. The being of the things is in us as creators and of them perceivers. Materialism, according to Wikipedia &#8220;is a philosophical current which aims to solve the cardinal or fundamental problem of philosophy about the relation between thinking and being, as opposed to idealism, between spirit and nature, postulating that matter is primary and consciousness and thinking are as its results&#8230;&#8221;  But let’s realize how concepts are inverted here and how the concept of &#8220;matter&#8221; is leading to the same point because it considered just as primary, is erroneously made objective and not subjective in our very being as the true universal, origin of consciousness and thoughts.</p>
<p>OBJECTIFICATION OF MATTER AS RESORT&#8217;S APPROACH TO SCIENCE.<br />
Science is primarily descriptive and as such can only be objective. The &#8220;matter&#8221; core of everything is in the same Being and its own consciousness. A way of materializing it (i.e. to see it an objective way) is considering it as a magnetic core with two concentration and diffusion forces. The nature of such forces or energy is not something objective because we can only guess through what moves or transforms; we see the effect and not the cause. Our will is power and we cannot see the difference between the two (will and energy) but making them subjective and objective in this order. Only in this way we can resolve the duality of the concept of energy. I don&#8217;t know if this is clear for scientists busy on this issue or if instead, the mental nature of reality is even ignored and considered falsely as physical or in a purely objective sense. Nothing, absolutely nothing escapes some concept or idea; we need to deepen on this in our interior to convince us. It is the same Being the subject of movement; we see it as on the outside as if it were something that we, ourselves, are not. The link between our personal and impersonal Being manifested in the plurality of beings and things is a mystery that can only be revealed from the inside each of us.</p>
<p>THE NATURE OF THE MOBILE AND CHANGEABLE<br />
What is finally what moves and changes, i.e. what is subject to the two nuclear forces of the Being (&#8220;matter&#8221;)? If I affirm that it is the same Being or matter I’ll be correct. We as a collective Being are making objective this active &#8220;matter&#8221;. All things that we call physical are not but the collective objectification of ideas. Nothing, absolutely nothing escapes to some concept; we need to deepen our interior on this to convince us. It is the same as being subject of movement; we see it outside as if it were something that we, ourselves, are not. The link between our personal being and impersonal being manifested in the plurality of beings and things is a mystery that can only be revealed from the inside of each of us. If this is so, scientific methodology would have a profound revolution, the &#8220;physical&#8221; call it &#8220;laboratory&#8221; experimentation will have no more priority. Real scientific experimentation will have field only from the inside of each of us and the socialization of science could only be done via intellect by discoverers of universal facts in which the Being plays the central role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relish the challenge. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/relish-the-challenge/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=94#comment-39</guid>
		<description>The purpose of true Science is the human solidarity

¿Which other one could it be? If we look at the origin and destination of absolutely everything in the Being, in the Supreme Being, how couldn’t we glimpse that the multiplicity of the Being in an infinite number of selves or Me’s will be finally one only? Who does not may see this separation as the cause of error, evil and unhappiness? Why do we postpone our true creative action? I appeal to those who have this same intuition; I would like that we look together at the cause of our mistakes and because of that of our sufferings. Scientists, as they actually claim to be, must change the sense of the current “Science” to that of a true one which must be inspired by human solidarity. Is it not the peace of the Nations the truly desired and whose task each of us unconsciously subtract? Ideas separate us, is it not our task to question about the origin of ideas? What is their motor? Science is formed by ideas and these necessarily originated in a personal self, in an Ego. Science unavoidably man-made has hidden trends; this must be clearly revealed. There are hidden pursued purposes disguised as &quot;objectivity&quot;. We can see these aims in the various applications of the so-called “science”. Only one application is the real one, that which serves the common interest of mankind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of true Science is the human solidarity</p>
<p>¿Which other one could it be? If we look at the origin and destination of absolutely everything in the Being, in the Supreme Being, how couldn’t we glimpse that the multiplicity of the Being in an infinite number of selves or Me’s will be finally one only? Who does not may see this separation as the cause of error, evil and unhappiness? Why do we postpone our true creative action? I appeal to those who have this same intuition; I would like that we look together at the cause of our mistakes and because of that of our sufferings. Scientists, as they actually claim to be, must change the sense of the current “Science” to that of a true one which must be inspired by human solidarity. Is it not the peace of the Nations the truly desired and whose task each of us unconsciously subtract? Ideas separate us, is it not our task to question about the origin of ideas? What is their motor? Science is formed by ideas and these necessarily originated in a personal self, in an Ego. Science unavoidably man-made has hidden trends; this must be clearly revealed. There are hidden pursued purposes disguised as &#8220;objectivity&#8221;. We can see these aims in the various applications of the so-called “science”. Only one application is the real one, that which serves the common interest of mankind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relish the challenge. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/relish-the-challenge/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=94#comment-38</guid>
		<description>The great challenge: human solidarity 

Human solidarity will be achieved only in the eternal and unchangeable; never will be achieved in ideas, religion, economic or social interests, etc. To believe in a God alien to our own Being, must be replaced by the awareness of an only eternal and indivisible Being creator and experimenter of his creation.

If we do not find this higher self in ourselves it is useless to seek it elsewhere. This is the great challenge of humanity: to achieve awareness of its Being creator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great challenge: human solidarity </p>
<p>Human solidarity will be achieved only in the eternal and unchangeable; never will be achieved in ideas, religion, economic or social interests, etc. To believe in a God alien to our own Being, must be replaced by the awareness of an only eternal and indivisible Being creator and experimenter of his creation.</p>
<p>If we do not find this higher self in ourselves it is useless to seek it elsewhere. This is the great challenge of humanity: to achieve awareness of its Being creator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relish the challenge. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/relish-the-challenge/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=94#comment-37</guid>
		<description>The fundamental Challenge

Being is simple. What does the Being need in order to be?  What do we need in order to be? The self is joined to a body, to a family, to a society, to a world of things which are never of our essentials. Why of this aberration to what is not our being’s essence? Needs are our own creations and how strongly have been linked to our being. To be free of them is to be free from something that is not us! What a great mistake! How hard is of it to be free! Is it not so too hard to achieve consciousness of our own being this way?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundamental Challenge</p>
<p>Being is simple. What does the Being need in order to be?  What do we need in order to be? The self is joined to a body, to a family, to a society, to a world of things which are never of our essentials. Why of this aberration to what is not our being’s essence? Needs are our own creations and how strongly have been linked to our being. To be free of them is to be free from something that is not us! What a great mistake! How hard is of it to be free! Is it not so too hard to achieve consciousness of our own being this way?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Relish the challenge. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/relish-the-challenge/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=94#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Limitation
The absolute reality is unattainable by the human mind. Only in the inner silence we can discover the superior man in each of us. He is the one who will help us to understand the absolute reality a sub-conscious, intuitive and somehow inexpressible way. This way considered we will not be subject to the limitations imposed by our human mental condition.

I Ching - Hexagram 40.  Hsieh / Deliverance

The Judgement

          Deliverance. The southwest furthers.
          If there is no longer anything where one has to go,
          Return brings good fortune.
          If there is still something where one has to go,
          Hastening brings good fortune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limitation<br />
The absolute reality is unattainable by the human mind. Only in the inner silence we can discover the superior man in each of us. He is the one who will help us to understand the absolute reality a sub-conscious, intuitive and somehow inexpressible way. This way considered we will not be subject to the limitations imposed by our human mental condition.</p>
<p>I Ching &#8211; Hexagram 40.  Hsieh / Deliverance</p>
<p>The Judgement</p>
<p>          Deliverance. The southwest furthers.<br />
          If there is no longer anything where one has to go,<br />
          Return brings good fortune.<br />
          If there is still something where one has to go,<br />
          Hastening brings good fortune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eliminate Distractions and Simplify by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/10/eliminate-distractions-and-simplify/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=80#comment-35</guid>
		<description>The I Ching, (why not “I”, myself?), must be seen as a permanent guide in any transcendent Act each one of us is going to perform, or we&#039;re just doing; this way we will have guarantee that our behavior is irreproachable and rightly adjusted to our final destination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The I Ching, (why not “I”, myself?), must be seen as a permanent guide in any transcendent Act each one of us is going to perform, or we&#8217;re just doing; this way we will have guarantee that our behavior is irreproachable and rightly adjusted to our final destination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Despite events that set you back, keep going forward and pursue your plans. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/09/despite-events-that-set-you-back-keep-going-forward-and-pursue-your-plans/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=75#comment-34</guid>
		<description>In general, Eastern philosophy is directly intended to be individual and personal; hence, its value is well above  Western philosophical thinking. I am referring specifically to Taoism and very promptly to the I Ching. This philosophy if one might call it so is hidden within the behavior guide factually offered to its followers. Its philosophical teaching leads to a genuine higher thinking subsequently joined to the individual and personal conduct each one has to observe meanwhile his existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, Eastern philosophy is directly intended to be individual and personal; hence, its value is well above  Western philosophical thinking. I am referring specifically to Taoism and very promptly to the I Ching. This philosophy if one might call it so is hidden within the behavior guide factually offered to its followers. Its philosophical teaching leads to a genuine higher thinking subsequently joined to the individual and personal conduct each one has to observe meanwhile his existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Despite events that set you back, keep going forward and pursue your plans. by wu.wang2</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/09/despite-events-that-set-you-back-keep-going-forward-and-pursue-your-plans/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 01:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=75#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Philosophy as science that does not lead to facts is useless. I do not know Western philosophical teaching disciplines which lead to facts or to positive changes in the human thinking and behavior at individual and personal level; it could be that those changes have social effects but in individual and personal fields it has little value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philosophy as science that does not lead to facts is useless. I do not know Western philosophical teaching disciplines which lead to facts or to positive changes in the human thinking and behavior at individual and personal level; it could be that those changes have social effects but in individual and personal fields it has little value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Despite events that set you back, keep going forward and pursue your plans. by wu.wang</title>
		<link>http://frostcloud.com/elements/2012/09/despite-events-that-set-you-back-keep-going-forward-and-pursue-your-plans/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>wu.wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostcloud.com/elements/?p=75#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Science and Philosophy should go hand in hand. Science without Philosophy cannot be Science in its total sense. If Philosophy begins in oneself then Science also starts in oneself. The scientific field is the experimental being and this field is none other than our own being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science and Philosophy should go hand in hand. Science without Philosophy cannot be Science in its total sense. If Philosophy begins in oneself then Science also starts in oneself. The scientific field is the experimental being and this field is none other than our own being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
